← All examples

Woman Who Killed Her Two Sons Found Not Criminally Responsible

September 17, 2026 · Australian Broadcasting Corporation

An Australian court ruled that the mother was so mentally ill at the time of the killings that she did not know what she was doing was wrong.

A court in New South Wales, Australia, has ruled that a woman who stabbed her two young sons to death in September 2024 is not criminally responsible for their deaths. The boys, aged nine and 11, were killed at the family's home in the Blue Mountains. The court decided that the woman was suffering from a very serious mental illness at the time, which meant she did not understand that what she was doing was wrong.

The children's father found them at their home and called Triple Zero, which is Australia's emergency phone number, similar to 911 in the United States. The woman was charged with murder, but she pleaded not guilty because of a mental health condition. The case was heard in the NSW Supreme Court, where a judge carefully reviewed all of the evidence before making a decision.

Judge Richard Cavanagh announced a special legal verdict called 'act proven but not criminally responsible.' This means the court agreed that the woman did commit the acts, but ruled that she cannot be held criminally responsible because of her mental state. This kind of verdict is different from being found guilty, because it takes into account whether a person truly understood that what they were doing was wrong.

Three expert psychiatrists — doctors who specialize in mental health — each interviewed the woman several times. All three doctors came to very similar conclusions after reviewing her case. They agreed that at the time of the killings, the woman was suffering from an extremely severe form of depression that caused her thinking to become psychotic, meaning she had lost touch with reality.

The psychiatrists also said the woman had a way of thinking called 'nihilistic' thinking, which means she believed everything was hopeless and meaningless. Because of this, she believed her children would be better off dead than living in the world. Judge Cavanagh said the expert opinions were so similar that the court was confident in relying on them to reach its verdict.

During the court proceedings, the woman appeared via a video link and sat slumped in her chair the entire time. She never raised her head, though she was seen wiping her eyes and blowing her nose at certain moments. Judge Cavanagh described the case as 'particularly tragic.'

Because she was found not criminally responsible, the woman will not go to a regular prison. Instead, she will be held in a location chosen by the Mental Health Review Tribunal, a special group that oversees the care of people found not criminally responsible due to mental illness. The tribunal will review her situation regularly, make sure she receives proper treatment, and decide when — or whether — it is safe for her to be released.

The accused was nihilistic in her thinking and wasn't able to reason other than her children would be better off dead in such a bad world.

Comprehension quiz preview

1. How old were the two boys who were killed?

  • ASeven and ten
  • BEight and twelve
  • CNine and eleven
  • DSix and nine

2. Who discovered the children at their home?

  • AA neighbor
  • BA police officer
  • CTheir grandmother
  • DTheir father

3. What special verdict did Judge Cavanagh announce?

  • ANot guilty by reason of insanity
  • BGuilty of manslaughter
  • CAct proven but not criminally responsible
  • DCase dismissed due to lack of evidence

Take this quiz — create your free account.

Start free

This story is available at 6 reading levels.

Start free →

Are you a teacher? Assign this article to your class — free, always.

Get teacher access →

6 reading levels

Start free →