Democrats Disagree on How Hard to Push Back on Big Companies
As Democrats get closer to winning back power in Congress, they are split over whether to investigate companies that sided with President Trump.
Democrats in Congress think they have a good chance of winning back control of the House or Senate next year. But even before that happens, they are already arguing among themselves about what to do with that power. The big question is: how hard should they go after companies that tried to stay friendly with President Donald Trump over the last two years?
Some Democrats, called moderates, say the party should focus on everyday problems like the high cost of health care, housing, and energy. They worry that going after big companies could look like revenge rather than real leadership. Rep. Bill Foster of Illinois and Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada are among those urging caution.
Foster said he does not want Democrats to act like they are simply punishing their enemies. He said some companies may have worked with Trump because they felt they had no choice. He thinks Democrats should figure out which companies were truly corrupt and which ones were just trying to survive.
Other Democrats, especially more progressive ones, disagree strongly. Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut wants Congress to use its oversight power to expose what he calls a 'corrupt relationship' between big companies and the Trump administration. Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said companies that caved to political pressure should be called out publicly.
Advocacy groups on the left are pushing hard for strong action. Ella Fanger, a policy adviser at a group called Demand Progress, warned that it would be 'political suicide' for Democrats to promise to fight corruption and then go easy on companies involved in it. Her group wants Democrats to be bold if they take back power.
The debate matters because several top Democrats are already in line to lead important oversight committees in Congress. California Rep. Robert Garcia could head the House Oversight Committee, and Rep. Maxine Waters could lead the House Financial Services Committee. Their decisions will shape the Democratic Party's message heading into the 2028 presidential election.
In other news, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, known as HUD, is being called out for weak oversight of public housing. House Financial Services Chair French Hill of Arkansas released a report saying both Congress and HUD need to do a much better job. He admitted that Congress has fallen short in the past and said big improvements are needed.
A bipartisan group in the House called the Build America Caucus released a 95-page plan to make it easier and faster to build homes across the country. One idea is to give more federal money to communities that allow more homes to be built near public transit. Another idea is to turn unused government buildings into housing for people who need it.
President Trump announced that Jay Clayton, the Director of National Intelligence, will also serve as the country's new artificial intelligence czar. That means Clayton will help guide the government's approach to AI technology. He will keep both jobs at the same time, which experts say shows Trump wants to manage AI carefully without adding too many new rules.
"We don't want to turn into a banana republic where you lose an election and it's all about retribution."
Comprehension quiz preview
1. What are Democrats arguing about even before they might win back Congress?
2. What does the word 'oversight' mean in this article?
3. Why might moderate Democrats be worried about going too hard after big companies?